No account, and no email to see your result
The scan takes about a minute
Every finding points at a specific line on your site
Same seven checks either way. Each extra site adds about a minute.
Web addresses, not company names. A name resolves to the wrong company quietly, and you would never find out which one we read.
We read the pages a buyer would reach, in the order they would reach them. Nothing is guessed. Every finding points at something on the page, and you can go and look at it.
Two seconds. Better to find a closed door now than after a minute of your time.
Nothing was read, so there is nothing to report. Usually this is a slip in the address rather than anything wrong with the site.
Worth checking the spelling. If the address is right and the site loads for you, it is refusing visitors it does not recognise, and we would rather tell you that than guess.
A report built on this would be mostly dashes, and dashes read as failure when they mean silence. So we are not building one.
A site this quiet is usually a company whose selling happens somewhere else entirely: in a room, on a call, through a distributor. That is a finding, but it is not one a scanner should score.
We can read either one. They are different companies with different sites, and a report on the wrong one would look completely normal.
Your report is ready and the comparison holds. We are naming the gap rather than quietly dropping the row, because a comparison with a silent hole in it is worse than one with a stated hole.
A stranger understands what you sell, and your claims hold up. But there is nowhere to go for someone who is not ready today, and nothing on the site is worth an email address.
The same seven, in the same order you read them a minute ago. Tap any one to see what we found.
41 posts, the most recent nine days ago. Most companies never build that much raw material. What is missing is not effort. It is three decisions about how the material gets used.
Three homepage headlines, word for word. On a site with one unifying idea this is easy.
The first one is yours. If you had to look twice, you just ran the test your buyers run without knowing they are running it.
| You | chartmogul | profitwell |
|---|
Neither company you named clears more of the seven than you do. That is normal. Almost nobody clears all seven, which is why three of them are worth doing now.
Fifteen pages of your public site, on 30 July. Nothing else. Where we could not see something we say so rather than guess.
It reads a public website, so it is good at finding what is missing and poor at confirming what is working. A company can be excellent at something and never say so online. If a finding here is wrong, say so: this is a read, not a verdict.
We never sign in, never accept a cookie banner, and never read social feeds. Every finding above traces to something on your site on the date shown.
Everything above came off your public pages. What it cannot see is how the company runs: whether five people describe the same customer the same way, whether anyone owns the marketing numbers, whether those numbers change what happens next month. That is usually where these three gaps come from.